Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Contemplating drastic change to mount handling From: Robert Collins To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020906030958.GA27496@redhat.com> References: <20020906030958 DOT GA27496 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vojwz0T2t9QATcSFeFfY" Date: 07 Sep 2002 02:18:43 +1000 Message-Id: <1031329123.1363.46.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-vojwz0T2t9QATcSFeFfY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 13:09, Christopher Faylor wrote: > This thinking came about due to some late night dabbling with tries as a > method for scanning the mount table. They hold great promise for this > since they are fast and handle maximal matching with ease. But, then I > was wondering how I could easily store the trie in shared memory since > it relies on pointers and sizing a trie ahead of time essentially > requires building the trie first and then copying it into shared memory > since we don't currently have a convenient method for allocating shared > memory. Why not store the trie in a binary blob in the registry? (I'm just thinking of minimal change needed to get the benefit).=20 I really like the use of tries, I've been meaning to get time to implement that for cygwin for ages. I dont' care either way about /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab. Rob --=-vojwz0T2t9QATcSFeFfY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9eNViI5+kQ8LJcoIRAi5FAJ475Auta5NKUVVgKNeNh1auecozTgCfdd1e 8pmP4MXdlaYnFWqEayVQqnM= =Ji3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vojwz0T2t9QATcSFeFfY--