Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:46:43 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: My bad: send & sendto on NT4.0 Message-ID: <20020822134643.C26346@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <01bf01c2491d$470d7a20$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020821165942 DOT Y26346 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020821165942.Y26346@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:16:01PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: > > I've just found out that the change I send in last week or so > > about using sendto rather than send works . . . except on NT4.0. > > Googling around has shown that this is a known problem and there's > > no patch available either AFAICT. So, it'll have to go. (Well, > > the recvfrom/recv patch might be able to stay but it seems > > cleverer just to remove the lot). Sorry about that: a bad call on > > my part. I'll provide a new patch to put it all back, along with > > a few other small patches that I've got queued up to submit. > > Obviously the original patch could just be reversed if that was > > felt preferable. > > Please provide a new patch which reverts the change, together with > an appropriate "Revert change ..." ChangeLog entry. This way we > keep the history. Conrad, what about this reverting? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.