Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:36:35 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Threads and the C++ new and delete operators Message-ID: <20020630163635.GA32201@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <001901c21eee$8aadf060$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <034301c21f49$a989f6e0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <002e01c21fca$f0b19560$1800a8c0 AT LAPTOP> <004401c22031$7f167620$6132bc3e AT BABEL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004401c22031$7f167620$6132bc3e@BABEL> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 01:27:26PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >If my diagnosis is correct, I'm surprised it's not been seen before >(like, in the cygwin DLL itself?). Then again, I'm having to stress >the program pretty heavily to trip it up. You may notice that cygwin does not use new/delete very much. This is one of the reasons why. cgf