Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:59:48 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: RFD: Dropping subauth support Message-ID: <20020614185948.M30892@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020614130531 DOT C30892 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3D0A1E0D DOT 4040601 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D0A1E0D.4040601@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 12:47:09PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > even WinNT, will be very old and not widely used, but WinXPhome and W2k > and whatever follows will account for a huge percentage of our installed > base. > > At that time, it would not be unreasonable to start using subauth...and > I'd hate for someone to re-invent the wheel. It does little harm to > keep the code in until then, does it? Sure. If there wouldn't be one problem. I said it works on W2K only. And I *mean* W2K only. It doesn't work on XP anymore. So there's little gain in keeping that code for a later time, AFAICS. Removing the code would clean up the setuid stuff a bit. Corinna