Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: committers?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:11:31 +1000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5E8B@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3K0BZc15885



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 10:09 AM
> To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: committers?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:22:33AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >I'm confused.  You have, on a fairly often basis, lamented the fact 
> >that no-one other than you and Corinna seems to take 
> responsibility for 
> >reviewing cygwin patches and changes.  You seem to be 
> indicating that 
> >you want more input into cygwin.  Yet when I do just that, 
> on a patch 
> >that is certainly not harmful (while maybe not optimal).  I didn't 
> >realise I was overstepping boundaries when I checked it in, so I'd 
> >appreciate it if you could restate those so I don't do so in future.
> 
> I don't know if you follow the gdb mailing list but it has 
> the concept of "maintainership".  We don't have anything as 
> formal here but I thought it was understood that only Corinna 
> and I have blanket checkin privileges.
> 
> I thought I'd explicitly said that anything thread-related 
> was in your domain.  And, I may have said that tty related 
> stuff was ok for Egor.

Ok, understood. Thanks.

I'll follow the patch details on the patch list.

Rob