Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <0cbc01c194d8$53f24e40$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: Cc: "Gary R. Van Sickle" Subject: Daemon (again) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:28:57 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2002 04:28:46.0986 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D1086A0:01C194D8] hey ho, Last time I raised this, Chris said "has anyone looked yet?" To which the answer (my friend) is blowing in the wind^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H... is AFAIK no. However in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2001-q4/msg00060.html Gary offered to look if the headache of changing is not too big. Gary, can I ask you to put setup aside for a little bit (It's now feature frozen bar my install-all feature) and review the daemon? Cygwin1.dll is nice and stable just now, so this would be an ideal time to add in the core of the daemon (the daemon itself, and Egors' security fix, but not IPC). I've merged CVS so it's up to date, it looks ok - I've done a test build. Remember, if you want to test the IPC, newlib needs a patch as well. Rob