Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3C0D026B.C546F6B9@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 12:05:47 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: CD List <Cygwin-Developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
CC: CD List <Cygwin-Developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: src/winsup/w32api ChangeLog include/commdlg.h  ...
References: <20011204152139 DOT T10634 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	 <20011203195935 DOT 7122 DOT qmail AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
	 <20011203233852 DOT C10634 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	 <3C0C016F DOT 101A8B1C AT yahoo DOT com>
	 <20011203235735 DOT E10634 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	 <20011204000806 DOT G10634 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	 <3C0CD705 DOT 178CB0E2 AT yahoo DOT com>
	 <085c01c17ccc$7520a1d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	 <3C0CD894 DOT EBF23D3E AT yahoo DOT com>
	 <20011204152139 DOT T10634 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	 <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011204110244 DOT 022c1ca8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	 <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011204113050 DOT 022a76d0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011204115238 DOT 022a9ee0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> 
> At 11:50 AM 12/4/2001, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 11:24 AM 12/4/2001, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > > >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So it looks like is valid to define IDC_STATIC at the system level...
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> So you had your answer by the criteria you were happy with.  Why did
> you bother asking others for this information?  You should really take
> a minute to tell others what you're asking for and why if you want a
> particular answer.  In this case, I don't think the rest of us needed
> to do the same search you did if that's what you wanted to base your
> decision on.  Seems to me that at least Corinna and I have been wasting
> some time guessing at the answer you were looking for...
> 

Because of your statement quoted above.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com