Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:23:59 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: consistent version of Interlocked* functions
Message-ID: <20011127052359.GA17708@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20011127014725 DOT GA13222 AT redhat DOT com> <008e01c176ff$65579060$578208d2 AT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <008e01c176ff$65579060$578208d2@itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:48:14PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:47 PM, cgf wrote:
>> Are there any objections to my using these?  Robert?  The thread code
>> would be the most affected, of course.
>
>I'll do a little research and get back to you.

I've just built a version of cygwin which uses these, fwiw.  Seems to be
fine on XP dual 733MHZ PIII.

*pause*

Sigh.  I got an "illegal operation" error *once* running this on Windows
95 on A pentium processor.  Otherwise, it actually seems to feel faster.

I can't duplicate the (&(*&% error, now though.

cgf