Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:37:53 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Fixing openssh to avoid occasional spurious connection failures Message-ID: <20011115233753.E27452@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20011115213959 DOT 6226 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <052f01c16e1f$ffb61890$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011115215733 DOT 6471 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011115230625 DOT D27452 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20011115221455 DOT 6571 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011115221455.6571.qmail@lizard.curl.com>; from jik@curl.com on Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 05:14:55PM -0500 On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 05:14:55PM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:06:25 +0100 > > From: Corinna Vinschen > > > > Don't think so. I think we could find a workaround by assigning > > local socket numbers in another range (>32768 or so). > > This will not solve the problem. > > If you read my test program, you will see that I am calling bind() on > the socket before connect(), and the bind() succeeds *** even though > the connect subsequently fails with WSAEADDRINUSE ***. So there's no > way to detect that winsock has assigned an in-use port to the socket > until it's too late. Can you give me a pointer to the KB article describing that winsock bug? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.