Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <02dc01c15b5f$43fa6a70$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Jonathan Kamens" <jik AT curl DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3BD4635D DOT 1060208 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011022142729 DOT A10309 AT redhat DOT com> <20011022192430 DOT 3581 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022193036 DOT 3609 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022203136 DOT 5144 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022203747 DOT 5162 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <02a201c15b5b$7910a4d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011023004450 DOT 7072 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.3.4 status?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:08:45 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2001 01:13:27.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB7A0DF0:01C15B5F]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Kamens" <jik AT curl DOT com>
To: <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: 1.3.4 status?


> >  From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
> >  Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:41:36 +1000
> >
> >  So, I'd start of by hand checking the faulting line of assembly, to
see
> >  that is *should* work if everything where normal, and then work
back
> >  through the stack trace doing the same thing.
>
> You're past my current level of knowledge -- the last time I tried to
> read assembler code it was in college, and it wasn't x86 assembler
> code, I can tell you that much.

No time like the present to learn :}. Seriously though, one cisc machine
is much like another when you're looking at mnemnonics. MC though is a
different beast :}.

Rob