Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 22:33:44 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Anyone looking at setup.ini, debugging setup.exe? Message-ID: <20010921223344.A30713@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010921122214 DOT A31619 AT redhat DOT com> <3BAC0A3D DOT 2729 DOT 3A9C91B7 AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BAC0A3D.2729.3A9C91B7@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:49:17AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb am 2001-09-21, 12:22: > >>I haven't seen any comments on my setup.ini checkin or on the bug >>that I think I found in setup.exe. >> >>Is anyone looking at these? > >Which is the latest setup.exe version? >Have not heard of a bug. What is it? See: Subject: new 'temp' directory in CVS cinstall contains dependency WIP The newest version of the setup sources are always in CVS. cgf