Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 02:01:18 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: possible explanation for make hang
Message-ID: <20010916020118.A30902@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010916013932 DOT A30789 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0109152245330 DOT 3759-100000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0109152245330.3759-100000@cesium.clock.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:58:30PM -0700, Matt wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:09:29PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>> You can't normally use WFMO for file handles.  I actually tried this an
>> hour or so ago to see if maybe it actually worked on Windows 95.  It
>> doesn't.
>
>Out of curiosity, are you testing on Win95 950, 950a, or 950b? I remember
>when I did QA, some API calls that did not work as documented on 950/950a
>would work fine on 950b. If you can't find 950b specifically, testing on
>win98 is almost equivelant (950b has the win98 "kernel", for the
>mostpart).
>
>If you don't have 950b or win98 handy, I can try an example test
>case if you have one compiled or in source.

It doesn't really matter.  If it doesn't work on one system, it isn't
useful.

cgf