Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:17:21 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
Subject: Re: [starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk: 1.3.2 -> 1.3.3: ssh-add fails on win98: "Could not open a connection to your authentication agent."]
Message-ID: <20010913211721.A26382@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
References: <20010913141057 DOT V1285 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010913211216 DOT A26350 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010913211216.A26350@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:12:16PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>[Grmbl, I've sent that using the wrong `From' address first]
>>
>>Egor,
>>
>>is it possible that this is a result of a failed secret check?
>>
>>I have straced ssh-add on a 98 system and the connect to the
>>ssh-agent fails with WSAECONNREFUSED.  The strace output also
>>shows an `accept from unauthorized server' message.  I wouldn't
>>understand why, though.
>
>I think I've checked in a fix for this.
>
>The new cygheap copying code made a snapshot of the cygheap prior to
>starting a process.  That means that any socket information that was
>being recorded in the parent was not getting transmitted to the child.

...since the socket info was happening after the child was started...

cgf