Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: daemon
From: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20010913135614.S1285@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References: <1000375038 DOT 6113 DOT 12 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> 
	<20010913135614 DOT S1285 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13 (Preview Release)
Date: 13 Sep 2001 21:59:12 +1000
Message-Id: <1000382362.8580.3.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2001 11:46:11.0699 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF742C30:01C13C49]

On Thu, 2001-09-13 at 21:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:57:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > The daemon is coming long nicely. I've a nearly complete transport layer
> > class, with a factory and virtual methods, to encapsulate all the
> > security impersonation and handshaking needed, allowing us to focus on
> > the daemon for now, or the transport or both.
> > 
> > However, I have a little question.
> > 
> > I want to use the same class inside and outside cygwin, for consistency,
> > and to prevent skew problems. The issue is that things like accept()
> > outside of cygwin are fine, but in cygwin you need to use
> > cygwin_accept().
> > 
> > So... is there someway to resolve that, without compiling the source
> > file twice (which is one way) or having a symlink to the source under a
> > different name (ugly IMO)?
> 
> Perhaps a header file which takes __INSIDE_CYGWIN__ into account?

Well that requires two.o files - which is what I've done as a temporary
measure (possibly  permanent). The problem is linktime symbols, not
compile time.

Rob