Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Quick testfeedback... From: Robert Collins To: Jason Tishler Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20010911111045.A2160@dothill.com> References: <20010911111045 DOT A2160 AT dothill DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1000248820.30279.22.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13 (Preview Release) Date: 12 Sep 2001 09:19:19 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2001 23:06:13.0926 (UTC) FILETIME=[5AA66C60:01C13B16] On Wed, 2001-09-12 at 01:10, Jason Tishler wrote: > Rob, > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 10:00:11PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > I have tested this out on win95 for regressions, but not on NT > > unfortunately... If some kind NT/2k user could test this I would be very > > appreciative. > > I ran your test suite with the latest CVS and then again after applying > your patch. In both cases, all tests except for pshared passed (as > to be expected). However, after patching, pt skipped a lot of values. > Is this because the implementation is much faster? I can send you the > output from make check, if necessary. No need, yes its faster :}. > Also, broadcast.exe (prior to patching) GPF-ed with: > > The instruction at "0x6100f0cb" referenced memory at "0x00000000". > The memory could not be "written". Was this before my bugfix commit? I had misused InterlockExchangePointer rather badly, which lead to pt and sched crashing for me. If it was after the bugfix commit, I'd like to see if we can track this asap... Rob