Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:29:45 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Unclear on pthreads status -- release 1.3.3?
Message-ID: <20010911122945.A1752@dothill.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010911110428.A12673@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i

Chris,

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:04:28AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I'm ready to release 1.3.3 but it seems like the final reports for
> pthreads are not yet in.
> 
> So, I guess I have another 24 hour wait on this?  Can anyone confirm
> or deny that Robert's changes have done the trick?

Rob's changes look good (at least) under Windows 2000.  I'm going to
drag out my old 4 GB disk with NT 4.0 SP6a and temporarily convert my
Linux box back to NT.  Just in case that you don't recall, I could only
reproduce the Python hang problem reliably under NT 4.0.

Can you give us another day or two -- I believe that we are real close
now?

Also, please see my (yet to be posted) follow ups to a couple of related
mailing list threads...

Thanks,
Jason