Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B7C4C9F.5010902@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 18:43:43 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Wilson CC: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Does CVS build? References: <20010815132450 DOT A1468 AT dothill DOT com> <3B7AEC05 DOT 7FBF0C8C AT yahoo DOT com> <20010815155157 DOT B20199 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815162916 DOT A28118 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815171031 DOT A29030 AT redhat DOT com> <3B7AE8D7 DOT 7050508 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7AFEF9 DOT 8070400 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7B2581 DOT 9090904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7B27C4 DOT 9000506 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7B3940 DOT 4090007 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Charles Wilson wrote: > Okay, with the attached patch (which includes Chris' change, but does > NOT include the modifications to "libiberty/configure" which autconf did: > > I was able to build cygiwn dll from source. Yay. > > this attached patch differs from the one I posted a few hours ago only > in that it includes the correction that I pointed out minutes later. Has anyone with autoconf-2.13 had a chance to test my patch? Should I submit it (well, minus the parts from cgf) to the newlib mailing list? --Chuck