Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:24:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers Subject: Re: Problems with autoconf-2.52 testsuite using current CVS Cygwin Message-ID: <20010730102418.J490@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygdev Mail-Followup-To: Corinna Vinschen , cygwin-developers References: <996329431 DOT 27668 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B63432E DOT 6050309 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B649305 DOT 2090302 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <010101c118ca$01155440$0300a8c0 AT ufo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <010101c118ca$01155440$0300a8c0@ufo>; from trevorforbes@ozemail.com.au on Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:04:00PM +0930 On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:04:00PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote: > For info. > > I rebuilt ash with the following line changed in shell.h > # ifdef __CYGWIN__ > # undef VFORK > # define VFORK 1 -> 0 > > All autoconfig test pass, I rebuilt and checked autoconf (CVS ver) 3 times > to see if the was any problems and it is rock solid.... Yep, I can reproduce that, too. What does that mean now? Is the VFORK a problem just for ash or is that a problem _in_ vfork? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.