Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <008001c1109d$40bca7e0$806410ac@local>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <005101c11036$06368800$806410ac AT local> <20010719112939 DOT A5093 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: fork on win95
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:53:31 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2001 21:40:05.0730 (UTC) FILETIME=[5FDBCC20:01C1109B]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>


> Hmm.  As I said, I actually tried my changes under Windows 95, so
> this will be difficult to track down, since I can't duplicate it.

I'll see what sort of info I can generate for you, but I'm still pleading
time shortage right now. I'll generate a strace as a minimum (ie strace
sh -c ls) which should show the failure to fork(). Anything else that might
spark neurons?

> Thanks for not saying "It worked fine in B20.1", by the way.  :-)

I forgot to mention that!. Doh!.

Rob