Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:46:24 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: Robert Collins Cc: Greg Smith , Cygwin-Developers Subject: Re: Threaded Cygwin Python Import Problem Message-ID: <20010713164623.E282@dothill.com> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Collins , Greg Smith , Cygwin-Developers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Mx+MOmLv6lQWkrt6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01a101c10bc9$ed28f160$806410ac@local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Organization: Dot Hill Systems Corp. --Mx+MOmLv6lQWkrt6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Rob, On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:30:42AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Tishler" > > [Moved from cygwin-patches to cygwin-developers...] > > Sorry I'm slow getting to this one :[. Time has been against me this last > month. Only this month? You are very lucky -- time has been against me for years... :,) > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:24:13PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > > > python test.py > > > > > > gdb.out: the event handle is clearly wrong. Can you include the output > > > of print *this ? and list (so I know what the lines actually are :])> > > > > See attached gdb.out. See attached for the latest gdb.out. Note this time "this" appears to reference valid memory. > Thanks. Unfortunately it looks like gcc has optimised out the value for > this. So no extra info was gained :[. You can access the correct data via > p *(pthread_mutex *) 0xa010a58 Are you sure about the above syntax? When I try this I get: (gdb) p this $8 = (pthread_mutex *) 0xa02b2fc (gdb) p *(pthread_mutex *) 0xa02b2fc A parse error in expression, near ` 0xa02b2fc'. Also, the value for "this" is different when displayed by "f" and "p": (gdb) f 2 #2 0x6105f34a in pthread_mutex::Lock (this=0xa010648) (gdb) p this $8 = (pthread_mutex *) 0xa02b2fc Am I doing something wrong? > ditto for the second trace... Unfortunately (or fortunately), invoking python via "python" or "./python" nows yields identical stack traces. Additionally, two times using "./python" did not hang. Note that my sandbox has been modified as described by: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2001-07/msg00070.html but otherwise, it is the same as before. Jason -- Jason Tishler Director, Software Engineering Phone: 732.264.8770 x235 Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: 732.264.8798 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com --Mx+MOmLv6lQWkrt6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gdb.out" (gdb) bt #0 0x77f6829b in ?? () #1 0x77f04f41 in ?? () #2 0x6105f34a in pthread_mutex::Lock (this=0xa010648) at ../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:644 #3 0x61060e06 in __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0xa011e20) at ../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:1917 #4 0x6103b3ae in pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0xa011e20) at ../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/pthread.cc:240 #5 0x61d99e37 in PyThread_acquire_lock (lock=0xa011e18, waitflag=0) at ../Python/thread_pthread.h:298 #6 0x61d8cebd in lock_import () at ../Python/import.c:159 .. (gdb) f 2 #2 0x6105f34a in pthread_mutex::Lock (this=0xa010648) at ../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:644 644 return WaitForSingleObject (win32_obj_id, INFINITE); (gdb) list 639 } 640 641 int 642 pthread_mutex::Lock () 643 { 644 return WaitForSingleObject (win32_obj_id, INFINITE); 645 } 646 647 int 648 pthread_mutex::TryLock () (gdb) p *this $6 = { = {magic = 1886217588}, win32_obj_id = 0x656c6966, condwaits = 0, pshared = 0} (gdb) p this $8 = (pthread_mutex *) 0xa02b2fc (gdb) p *(pthread_mutex *) 0xa010648 A parse error in expression, near ` 0xa010648'. (gdb) p *(pthread_mutex *) 0xa02b2fc A parse error in expression, near ` 0xa02b2fc'. --Mx+MOmLv6lQWkrt6--