Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <02aa01c0f08c$e6f5a5c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <000901c0ef4e$904cbe50$6e032bb7 AT BRAMSCHE> <018e01c0ef53$02e833f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010607155145 DOT A21540 AT redhat DOT com> <009901c0efa2$23f65320$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <15974599808 DOT 20010608103149 AT logos-m DOT ru> <01e201c0f04e$d42f5140$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010608214444 DOT K18483 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Subject: Re: dtable changes causing _very_ slow startup and process-startup headache. [was Re: auto-import ld] Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:35:51 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2001 02:26:45.0284 (UTC) FILETIME=[A0A7B640:01C0F08B] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Corinna Vinschen" > > I'm in a workgroup either and I have a 2nd box which is a domain > member. Both boxes don't have the delay. Could you please debug > that further? Sure. The long delay occurs on security.cc:230, the call to NetServerEnum(NULL, 101, (LPBYTE *) &buf, MAX_PREFERRED_LENGTH, &cnt, &tot, SV_TYPE_DOMAIN_CTRL, primary, NULL). I have no other MS machines on my LAN, or in the workgroup. Further to that MS networking services such as the computer browser and "Server" service are not running on my machine. (Funnily enough I like having RAM from my use :] ). I suspect that the NetServerEnum call is forcing the redirector to try and find a MS Networking server by broadcasts :[. I'm not quite sure what assumptions are made in the code about how the get_lsa_srv_inf funciton operates ... but I wonder if it's possible to optimise out this call if the (username's domain is NULL ) || (the username's domain == machine name) ? Also, from memory (need to go to the office to confirm) NT and 2000 always have a net use connection to the logon server, we might test for that? Rob