Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <000701c0de35$afc7e540$44493209@fishkill.ibm.com> From: "John Fortin" To: References: <20010515190505 DOT A7473 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: I guess I'm giving up on the "experiment" Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:26:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > I'm kind of curious myself. I think you might want to give it a while > longer for several reasons: > > 1) as you pointed out - you have a "knee jerk" reaction to answer all > messages as soon as you read them. (Example: the misspelled main > problem: several folks might have caught that one - maybe even me if I > looked close enough). > > 2) Some of us contribute very little and are even learners so we aren't > much help, but in a case of someone not getting an answer then some of us > that do not speak up much might begin to speak a little more. Of course > if a questions looks as if it won't be answered which would be a terrible > thing and is extremely frustrating for those that originally asked then > by all means speak up (but this will limit your responses - maybe ;-) ) > > 3) As the experiment has only run for 9 days, the trend has not had > sufficient enough time for all folks to change their styles and for > others to become more vocal. Rome was not built in a day. > > bk I agree...and maybe limit yourself to particularly difficult or non-FAQ type questions. John