Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:36:39 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: I guess I'm giving up on the "experiment"
Message-ID: <20010516123639.G16057@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010515190505 DOT A7473 AT redhat DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010516113350 DOT 0163df78 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010516113350.0163df78@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:35:06AM -0400

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:35:06AM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:35:06 -0400
>To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
>From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
>Subject: Re: I guess I'm giving up on the "experiment"
>In-Reply-To: <20010515190505 DOT A7473 AT redhat DOT com>
>
>At 07:05 PM 5/15/2001, you wrote:
>>I'm going to go back to responding to email.  I'll be ramping up in the
>>next few days but I hope that I will be able to curb my knee-jerk
>>posting response and let other people fill the void or, ideally, let
>>people figure things out for themselves.  There has been been some small
>>evidence of that.
>
>Why are you stopping the "experiment" now?  Just curiuos.

I have been feeling bad about not responding to people with valid
concerns.  And, I felt the need to justify my response to the mount
output question...

I don't plan on being very prolific but do you think it is worth continuing?
Maybe I just had a moment of weakness.

cgf