Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <008b01c0ca1a$0879bbd0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3ADD0441 DOT 91F76FB6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3ADE1FC1 DOT F0A10A89 AT cygnus DOT com> <3ADE640A DOT 34E88DCE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE040FC DOT 16BD67BC AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE070F3 DOT 1C45633A AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420145228 DOT B25768 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0894D DOT 5288FDF3 AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420152744 DOT A26175 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0E6C9 DOT CFA716BF AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE108A4 DOT C4C0E026 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010421001605 DOT A23949 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 14:17:50 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2001 04:09:56.0533 (UTC) FILETIME=[ECAF9650:01C0CA18]

I'm just heading out, but I'm going to checkout a new working dir and
commit the win9x pthread stuff either late tonight or first thing
tomorrow.

Rob


----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib


> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 12:12:20AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >If my arguments are correct, a patch to implement the required
changes
> >is attached.  I've rebuilt cygwin1.dll (*again*) with these patches,
> >and run my test suite (*again*) also against this new(er)
> >cygwin1.dll/newlib.
>
> Any chance that you could adapt this test suite to the cygwin test
> suite, Chuck?
>
> Also, I didn't see anything in your tests that would block a 1.3.0
> release.  I'm hoping to do that real soon.
>
> In fact, I had a 1.3.0 version on sources.redhat.com briefly before I
> remembered that we're waiting for Robert Collins to check in his
recent
> patches.
>
> cgf
>