Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 00:16:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib Message-ID: <20010421001605.A23949@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <3ADD0441 DOT 91F76FB6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3ADE1FC1 DOT F0A10A89 AT cygnus DOT com> <3ADE640A DOT 34E88DCE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE040FC DOT 16BD67BC AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE070F3 DOT 1C45633A AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420145228 DOT B25768 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0894D DOT 5288FDF3 AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420152744 DOT A26175 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0E6C9 DOT CFA716BF AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE108A4 DOT C4C0E026 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3AE108A4.C4C0E026@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 12:12:20AM -0400 On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 12:12:20AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >If my arguments are correct, a patch to implement the required changes >is attached. I've rebuilt cygwin1.dll (*again*) with these patches, >and run my test suite (*again*) also against this new(er) >cygwin1.dll/newlib. Any chance that you could adapt this test suite to the cygwin test suite, Chuck? Also, I didn't see anything in your tests that would block a 1.3.0 release. I'm hoping to do that real soon. In fact, I had a 1.3.0 version on sources.redhat.com briefly before I remembered that we're waiting for Robert Collins to check in his recent patches. cgf