Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 22:55:39 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib
Message-ID: <20010420225539.A4398@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <3ADD0441 DOT 91F76FB6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3ADE1FC1 DOT F0A10A89 AT cygnus DOT com> <3ADE640A DOT 34E88DCE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE040FC DOT 16BD67BC AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE070F3 DOT 1C45633A AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420145228 DOT B25768 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0894D DOT 5288FDF3 AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420152744 DOT A26175 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0E6C9 DOT CFA716BF AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010420224935 DOT A4247 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010420224935.A4247@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:49:35PM -0400

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:49:35PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I just checked and see that there are a few functions defined that way
>now but I'm not sure what the rationale for doing things this way is.

I should have said that there are "a few functions exported that way"
in cygwin.din.

cgf