Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:04:27 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: process shared mutexs
Message-ID: <20010418150427.B3648@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <008a01c0c7eb$dd0d6b20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <008a01c0c7eb$dd0d6b20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:42:10PM +1000

On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:42:10PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Chris,
>    I'm working on process shared mutexs at the moment. I think the ABI
>will need to change to accomodate them (I'm not sure just yet). Can you
>hold of rolling 1.3 until I can confirm what needs to happen?

Hmm.  Is this the pthread ABI, I assume?

I'll hold off for a couple of days.  I'm about to check in a potentially
destabiliizing change to fd table inheritance that will probably need a couple
of days to settle down, anyway.

So, I guess we're shooting for next weekend for 1.3.0.

cgf