Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To: <nhv AT cape DOT com>
From: "Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: indent syntax
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:10:37 -0400
Message-ID: <001c01c0c299$91518ec0$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010411103347.01625560@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal

>> > >>
>> > >> We're using the GNU Coding Standard:
>> > >>
>> > >> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html
>> > >>
>>
>>Ah. I'll see what I can find for indent and C++. I'm not 
>looking forward
>>to reformatting these source files by hand to fix indent's confusion.
>>
>>Rob
>
>You may want to look at bcpp.  It purports to be a "C(++) Beautifier".

I have recently gone though a search for a 'good' free C++ Beautifier 
for another project.  In the end we deciced that there really wasn't 
a good one but decided on using indent.

Artistic Style was a very strong contender though and is my personal 
favorite for C++ code
http://astyle.sourceforge.net/

Norman Vine