Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010405101523.0210a6f0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 10:18:21 -0400 To: Earnie Boyd From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: New output from mount.exe Cc: "Parker, Ron" , cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3ACC535D.59735CFC@yahoo.com> References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010404180312 DOT 02131170 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 07:13 AM 4/5/2001, Earnie Boyd wrote: >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: > > > > At 04:41 PM 4/4/2001, Parker, Ron wrote: > > >Outputting c:/foo could just as easily lead to the naive user inferring that > > >c:/foo is a legal cygwin path. > > > > Just one note. c:/foo *is* a legal Cygwin path. > > > >And that was the point of an emphasis I made in a different thread on >cygwin-apps. And the point here is that since c:\foo becomes c:foo in >bash then we should output c:/foo so that that is what the user becomes >familiar with. Yes Earnie, I should have referenced your very recent comment to this affect. Also, I don't have any argument against your suggestion to output c:/foo as opposed to c:\foo (or c:\\foo). Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX