Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:32:28 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup.exe busted.  Please fix?
Message-ID: <20010315153228.A5063@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010315141029 DOT A4053 AT redhat DOT com> <VA DOT 000006ca DOT 0095ea98 AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <VA.000006ca.0095ea98@thesoftwaresource.com>; from bkeener@thesoftwaresource.com on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 03:05:59PM -0500

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 03:05:59PM -0500, Brian Keener wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 3.0.2-2  3.0.2-2-src ncftp
>> 
>> The contrib/ncftp directory contains both the source and binary
>> tar balls.
>> 
>> Could someone fix this, please?
>
>Have you noticed this behavior before or do you think this is something 
>new - not that it diminishes the fact it needs fixing - really just 
>curious.  From what I recollect though - I started to say it had probably 
>been there but it just hit me (big lightbulb) - this is probably a direct 
>result of the previous change I submitted. :-(

I have never noticed it before, and I would have.  I haven't built setup.exe
for a while now, though.  I built it today because I'm involved in an FSF
project which will be selling a Cygwin CD and I wanted to include the latest
version of setup on it.

>Do all source tarballs end in the -src convention or should we make it a 
>convention??

All source tarballs end in -src.

cgf