Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3A82AB0A.7BAAFAE1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:19:54 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: A process can't have more than 63 child processes.
References: <s1sofwd7dq0 DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp> <20010208090337 DOT A29571 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> Yep.  This has been noted before.  The WaitForMultipleObjects
> restriction makes it impractical to have more than 63 children.
> 
> I guess we should set PSIZE to 64.
> 

Your scope seems limiting.  What about a Cygwin developed
WaitForMultipleObjects?  Perhaps even using the one from ReactOS. ;) I
know, I know, where's the patch?

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com