Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:52:30 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Remember me?-) Message-ID: <20010207205230.A21407@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <001301c0916b$aed385c0$0201a8c0 AT sos> <20010207201621 DOT C20667 AT redhat DOT com> <001e01c09171$6508c760$0201a8c0 AT sos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <001e01c09171$6508c760$0201a8c0@sos>; from sos@prospect.com.ru on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:49:32PM -0500 On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:49:32PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: >> From: "Christopher Faylor" >> Long time, no communicate! >> > >I had nothig to contribute to cygwin project, it's in a great shape >already:-) > >> Do you think that this would be a general replacement for cygwin's fork? >> > >I don't know... I want to investigate and to benchmark the code first. And >the code has one open issue. I've found the code in "Windows NT/2000 native >API reference" ISBN 1-57870-199-6. Yep. I've looked at that code. I thought it had some kind of issue that made it unacceptable but I can't remember what it was. cgf