Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:56:50 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0?
Message-ID: <20010130105650.A9558@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3A7653B1 DOT 115EFB2F AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A7653B1.115EFB2F@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:40:01AM -0500

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:40:01AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> Subject: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0?
>> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:42:18 -0500
>> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
>> To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
>> 
>> I think I'll be making a 1.1.8 release in the next couple of days.
>> 
>> Earnie, I assume that w32api and mingw are ok, right?  I'll make a new
>> release of those, too.
>> 
>> In the future, if you would like me to make a release of either of those
>> separate from a cygwin release, let me know.  That's why I uncoupled those
>> two releases from cygwin.
>> 
>> Or, if you want to take over release duties for them, that's fine, too.
>> 
>> On a different subject, is it time to bump the release to 1.3.0?  Red Hat
>> is working on a 1.2.0 version of the DLL which is loosely based on 1.1.6
>> (or so).  I wish I'd thought to bump the net release to 1.2.0 when we
>> branched but... I didn't.
>
>Don't forget to remove unctrl.h from the cygwin-1.1.8/1.3.0 release. 
>(I'd check the current cvs since you might have already done this, but
>I'm on a REAL slow connection right now.)

Yep.  I added it to my build script and it seems to have worked.  I
can't take it out of newlib since I assume it is there for a reason
other than cygwin.

cgf