Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3A7652F5.69E065BC@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:36:53 -0500 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers-digest-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com CC: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-developers Digest 30 Jan 2001 02:42:58 -0000 Issue 392 References: <980822578 DOT 24890 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0? > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:42:18 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > > I think I'll be making a 1.1.8 release in the next couple of days. > > Earnie, I assume that w32api and mingw are ok, right? I'll make a new > release of those, too. > > In the future, if you would like me to make a release of either of those > separate from a cygwin release, let me know. That's why I uncoupled those > two releases from cygwin. > > Or, if you want to take over release duties for them, that's fine, too. > > On a different subject, is it time to bump the release to 1.3.0? Red Hat > is working on a 1.2.0 version of the DLL which is loosely based on 1.1.6 > (or so). I wish I'd thought to bump the net release to 1.2.0 when we > branched but... I didn't. Don't forget to remove unctrl.h from the cygwin-1.1.8/1.3.0 release. (I'd check the current cvs since you might have already done this, but I'm on a REAL slow connection right now.) --Chuck