Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <20000626003445.27880.qmail@web108.yahoomail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:34:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: Introducing slight binary incompatibility in newer executables? To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Chris Faylor wrote: -8<- > > I don't think this binary incompatibility is so great that we need to bump > the middle number. If we do that then we should probably think about other > changes as well and maybe even creating a cygwin2.dll. > IMHO, it is, any cygwin-app that is updated now, will have to have the updated cygwin1.dll. What other changes are you thinking of? > > Anyway, my initial thought that my changes would speed things up may have > been too optimistic. The DLL that I've created is 30K larger than the > previous version and I'm not sure why. I'm investigating now. > You also said that it would decrease the size of the executable, is this accomplished. If so, then it could still be worth it. BTW, try adding a -D__OPTIMIZE_SIZE__ to the newlib/libc/string/Makefile to see if you notice and increase in speed. Regards, ===== --- Earnie Boyd: __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__ Cygwin Newbies: __Minimalist GNU for Windows__ Mingw32 List: Mingw Home: __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/