Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <20000625221326.12037.qmail@web117.yahoomail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com
Subject: Re: Added cygwin version info to cygcheck.cc
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--- Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:
> I just checked in a change that adds cygwin version info to cygcheck
> output.  When cygcheck finds a DLL named "cygwin1.dll" it attempts to
> read version info from the file.  If it fails then nothing is printed.
> Otherwise the output looks like this:
> 
>  6494k 2000/06/25 f:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
>     Cygwin DLL version info:
>         dll major: 1001
>         dll minor: 3
>         dll epoch: 19
>         dll bad signal mask: 19005
>         dll old termios: 5
>         api major: 0
>         api minor: 22
>         shared data: 3
>         dll identifier: cygwin1
>         mount registry: 2
>         cygnus registry name: Cygnus Solutions
>         cygwin registry name: Cygwin
>         program options name: Program Options
>         cygwin mount registry name: mounts v2
>         build date: Sat Jun 24 20:46:08 EDT 2000
>         shared id: cygwin1S3-2000-06-24 20:46
> 

This looks great.  I'm wondering if it is possible to add something to identify
an official Cygnus release versus a local build?  It would be nice to know if
someone has potentially modified the source of the dll locally.

Regards,

=====
---
   Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
            __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html>
           __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
  Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/>
    Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/