Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 23:08:14 -0400 Message-Id: <200005230308.XAA00967@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com In-reply-to: <20000522230314.A16259@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on Mon, 22 May 2000 23:03:14 -0400) Subject: Re: Next net release will be 1.1.3 References: <20000522172249 DOT A10159 AT cygnus DOT com> <200005222150 DOT RAA31092 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000522214900 DOT A15450 AT cygnus DOT com> <200005230154 DOT VAA00386 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000522230314 DOT A16259 AT cygnus DOT com> > At one point you were going to have cygcheck grab the version info > strings from the cygwin DLL. That would probably be useful. There > is code in setup.c that could be stolen to do this. Should be easy to do. Anyone want to volunteer for this fun task? :-) > We have enough space in utsname to add an "S" to the version number, too, > if that would help make it clear that a user was running a snapshot. Hmmm... we've got 9 characters. How about *replacing* the version number with ss-YYMMDD for snapshots, and "devYYMMDD" for developer builds?