Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 21:54:19 -0400 Message-Id: <200005230154.VAA00386@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com In-reply-to: <20000522214900.A15450@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on Mon, 22 May 2000 21:49:00 -0400) Subject: Re: Next net release will be 1.1.3 References: <20000522172249 DOT A10159 AT cygnus DOT com> <200005222150 DOT RAA31092 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000522214900 DOT A15450 AT cygnus DOT com> > The theory that people using snapshots know what they are doing was > disproved long ago. I initially wanted the snapshots to be only > used by developers but that never really caught on. I can fix this, but it will annoy the developers too. Of course, they should be building out of CVS anyway :-) > >That's a good idea. I, however, think "1.1.1+20000522" should be in > >place of "1.1.2". > > The snapshot date has been part of the dll for some time: OK, let me ask a different question. If a user is using a snapshot, and you later ask them "what version of cygwin1.dll are you using?", where do you expect them to get the answer to that? And, can we change *that* spot to tell them it's a snapshot?