Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 23:47:42 -0400
Message-Id: <200005130347.XAA22663@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
In-reply-to: <20000512231658.B2496@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
	Fri, 12 May 2000 23:16:58 -0400)
Subject: Re: A riskier alternative to "latest"?
References: <20000512171353 DOT A2947 AT cygnus DOT com> <200005122126 DOT RAA19789 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000512231658 DOT B2496 AT cygnus DOT com>


> Maybe the best plan is to just release ash and a vfork version of cygwin
> and drop back if this causes problems.

In DJGPP-land, we do keep the previous version around for a little
while until we know the new version is at least as good as it.