Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:13:53 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: A riskier alternative to "latest"? Message-ID: <20000512171353.A2947@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i I have an experimental version of ash which uses "vfork" that I'd like people to test. I was thinking of creating a "development" directory which mirrors "latest" that could hold something like this. I'd also need to provide a version of cygwin compiled with the "-DNEWVFORK" in this directory. This is similar to a lot of other projects so I don't think this is a very radical concept. The only thing I don't know about is what to name the directory, actually. Is "development" clear? Some projects call it "dontuse" or "new", too. cgf