Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <38E4F734.CC50512E@vinschen.de> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:06:28 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygdev X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: net release/installer status? References: <20000328174122 DOT A29443 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000330230128 DOT A4314 AT cygnus DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:45:59PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote: > >On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Chris Faylor wrote: > > > >> > >> I don't see a syntax error. It seems to be legal to have: > >> > >> for f ; in stuff; do > >> > >> I don't know why you're seeing an error. Is the above command an error > >> on your system? > > > >Same here. Bash, pdksh, ash, the real ksh from AT&T, all handle this > >correctly. > > I think that this is broken in older bashes. > > cgf Hmm, I get this output of bash --version: /home/corinna$ bash --version GNU bash, version 2.03.0(1)-release (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Corinna