Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:20:05 -0500 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: net release/installer status? Message-ID: <20000327202005.A24362@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000327162256 DOT A22260 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: ; from m.ring@ndh.net on Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 12:18:19AM +0200 On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 12:18:19AM +0200, Michael Ring wrote: >On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 16:22:56 -0500, you wrote: > >>I'd like to make a net release very soon. Has anyone tried Robert's >>installer? Are there other outstanding issues? >> > >Do you think you can find the time to think about a rpm-based >installation? (Or better : to try it out ;-) ) We've already discussed what we're going to do for this next release. It's not going to be .rpm, currently. >Even if you choose not to use rpm, you should definitely consider to >eliminate duplicate files in your .tar.gz files. I will be glad to >help in the process. I'm not sure what you consider to be a "duplicate" file. The files should all be the same and should be installed in the same location. If they aren't please post the differences so that we can analyze what is going on. cgf