Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:30:51 -0500 To: Earnie Boyd Cc: Rick Rankin , Cygwin , cygwin developers Subject: Re: uname on Win2k Message-ID: <20000228153051.A22601@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000228203423 DOT 19076 DOT qmail AT web110 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i In-Reply-To: <20000228203423.19076.qmail@web110.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 12:34:22PM -0800 On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 12:34:22PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- Rick Rankin wrote: >> 'uname -a' gives >> >> PC-FLTLG 1.1.0(0.17/3/2) 2000-02-28 00:50:29 i686 unknown > >This is the format that Cygwin uses. And as you said value of uname -s is >blank because Cygwin doesn't yet recognize NT5 as a valid system. > >You should find the code that emits the value for uname -s, change it, and >submit a patch. No. This is not the case. The snapshot had a problem. Didn't you see my email explaining this??? cgf