Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:11:50 -0500 To: Mumit Khan Cc: Earnie Boyd , DJ Delorie , cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: next net release preliminary info Message-ID: <20000126181150.C6140@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mumit Khan , Earnie Boyd , DJ Delorie , cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000126204839 DOT 22532 DOT qmail AT web110 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 05:08:10PM -0600 On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 05:08:10PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote: >On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Would libiberty an example? Or, BFD? If so, it's extremely hard to make >sure you can get by with a single version for all the packages that >depend on it (especially true of BFD). I don't see the point in putting >all that effort in. I agree. This is unfortunate but true. cgf