Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <20000126204839.22532.qmail@web110.yahoomail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:48:39 -0800 (PST) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: next net release preliminary info To: DJ Delorie Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- DJ Delorie wrote: > > > This is good too. I would like to see the things common to each package, > > things like readline, intl, etc. moved to this level and removed from the > > package for the sake of the cygwin distributions as well. This would cut > down > > on the size of each package but would require managing dependencies > > differently. > > But, the officially released packages each have different versions of > these common things. What then? Well, that is one of the problems of managing dependencies. IMO, the most recent stable versions of these libraries should be used anyway. Yes, the official distributed version of a package, packages the dependency packages for convenience. However, the Cygwin distribution isn't the official release and doesn't need the convenience of the packaged dependency package then Cygwin can and should package them separately so that the most current can be used. Also, IMO, I consider it improper to package the dependencies with the package, but each should be made available independent of the package. This allows, the most correct version to be used in all cases, especially for a project like Cygwin that packages so many separate packages. ===== Earnie Boyd Cygwin Newbies, please visit __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com