Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:20:47 -0800 From: Geoffrey Noer To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin PATH reorg? Message-ID: <19991119122047.B32163@cygnus.com> References: <19991119134736 DOT A17795 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <19991119134736.A17795@cygnus.com>; from Chris Faylor on Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 01:47:36PM -0500 On Fri, Nov 19, 1999, Chris Faylor wrote: > > Given the number of problems that seem to crop up with people on the > cygwin mailing list, I was wondering if it made sense to have cygwin > probe the path list looking for the directory which is essentially > "/bin" and put this directory first in the PATH. This doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Somewhat hidden cleverness is really dangerous. Could better documentation possibly accomplish the same goals? Dunno, but I would think that would be preferable. -- Geoffrey Noer Email: noer AT cygnus DOT com Cygnus Solutions