Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:04:33 -0500 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Maintainers wanted Message-ID: <19991118160433.A13395@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i I sent a plea to the cygwin mailing list asking for volunteers to maintain packages but didn't get much response. So, I'm trying the same thing here with high hopes that I'll get a better response. I would like the next release of cygwin to be a joint effort by a number of people. I would like volunteers to be responsible for building and maintaining various parts of the distribution. Basically, I see it broken down like this: Package Maintainer -------------------------------------------------- ash cgf bash ??? bash, bison, lex ??? (not much activity anticipated here) binutils mumit? bzip2 ??? cygwin DLL and utilities cgf, dj diff ??? fileutils ??? findutils ??? gawk ??? gcc mumit? gdb cgf grep ??? gzip ??? less ??? libiberty cgf, dj (need to coordinate with gcc/gdb maintainer) make ??? man ??? man pages ??? ncurses ??? sed ??? tar ??? texinfo ??? textutils ??? time ??? top-level configure/make/include cgf, dj I'm undoubtedly missing something here, but I thought I'd throw this out to see if anyone has any thoughts or would like to volunteer. What I would like to do is break each of these up into its own tar file and then provide the maintainer with a way to upload updated tar files into an incoming area. The tar files will be semi-automatically updated in some kind of new download area. This will allow us to keep cygwin as an evolving entity. It will also mean that we might need to add version numbers to the individual packages. Btw, the next version of Cygwin will be 1.1.0. DJ and I have decided to adopt the linux method for numbering releases. Thoughts? cgf