Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <19991015141045.10072.rocketmail@web119.yahoomail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 07:10:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: Win 2000 To: N8TM AT aol DOT com, george AT eddieware DOT org, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This is not a "cygwin" developer issue. Please remove the cygwin-developers address when responding. Rule of thumb if you are not involved with developing cygwin then you probably shouldn't be posting to cygwin-developers. If you are helping with developing cygwin then the only posts to the cygwin-developers list should be questions and patches concerning the cygwin source code. Earnie. --- N8TM AT aol DOT com wrote: > In a message dated 10/14/99 9:50:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > george AT eddieware DOT org writes: > > > How I would detect the OS variable WINVER to be > > related to Win2000 (NT5.0) > Yes, at least in beta 3, it identifies itself as nt5. The only place I know > where the gcc compiler distribution checks Windows versions is in libU77, > where NT5 is treated the same as NT4. AFAIK cygwin also treats NT5 the same > as NT4 but it doesn't exhibit all the NT4 bugs when running under W2K. It > beats me how you could make a program more portable by distinguishing between > > them. > > Tim > tprince AT computer DOT org > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com