Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:58:20 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: DJ Delorie Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: libcygwin.a as a symbolic link to lib{c,m}.a -- need insight Message-ID: <19990820185820.F7062@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: DJ Delorie , cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <19990820133204 DOT A5087 AT cygnus DOT com> <199908202229 DOT RAA28257 AT mercury DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> <19990820184852 DOT B7062 AT cygnus DOT com> <199908202253 DOT SAA28267 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <199908202253.SAA28267@envy.delorie.com>; from DJ Delorie on Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 06:53:35PM -0400 On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 06:53:35PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >> "My libc.a is only 14 bytes. I think that's why I'm getting syntax >> errors in my source file." > >When we switched from djgpp v1 to v2, we moved a lot of optional >libraries *into* libc.a, and built a bunch of "14 byte" libraries in >case anyone tried to use them. We get less FAQs now. But that was the only thing you *could* do with DJGPP, right? It doesn't have symbolic links, does it? cgf