Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:15:54 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: DJ Delorie Cc: khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: running two independent Cygwin DLLs? Message-ID: <19990627231554.A8977@cygnus.com> References: <199906280258 DOT VAA23658 AT mercury DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> <199906280305 DOT XAA00938 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <19990627231051 DOT B8904 AT cygnus DOT com> <199906280312 DOT XAA00996 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <199906280312.XAA00996@envy.delorie.com>; from DJ Delorie on Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 11:12:03PM -0400 On Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 11:12:03PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >> Actually, all you have to do is "configure --enable-debugging". That >> will cause the shared memory regions to be named based on the date/time. > >What about the mount tables, though? Depending on *what* you're >experimenting with, you may still need to isolate other parts of the >dll's shared resources. The mount info is stored in the shared memory region. Using --enable-debugging should isolate everything since it affects the base name that is used to generate shared resources. cgf